高质量人力资本对数字产业结构优化的影响研究

doi:10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20241030.001

资源与产业 ›› 2025, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 107-119.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20241030.001

高质量人力资本对数字产业结构优化的影响研究

张宁¹,苗圃^2，3,丁晨辉⁴

（1.常州工业职业技术学院数字商务学院，江苏常州 213164；2.常州工业职业技术学院旅游与康养学院，江苏常州 213164；3.上海海事大学经济管理学院，上海 201306；4.河海大学商学院，江苏南京 211100）

收稿日期:2024-05-23 修回日期:2024-08-20 出版日期:2025-02-20 发布日期:2025-02-20
通讯作者: 苗圃，博士生、讲师，主要从事产业经济研究。E-mail: miaopuxuzhou@126.com
作者简介:张宁，硕士、讲师，主要从事产业经济研究。E-mail: 502332960@qq.com
基金资助:
江苏省社会科学基金项目（22EYC013）；江苏省青蓝工程（2024年）；江苏省科技智库计划（调研课题）项目（JSKXKT2024084）；江苏省教育科学规划项目（C/2023/02/13）；江苏省职业教育研究项目（XHYBLX2023007）；常州大学高等职业教育研究院项目（CDGZ2021043）。

IMPACTS OF HIGH-QUALITY HUMAN CAPITAL ON OPTIMIZATION OF DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE

ZHANG Ning¹, MIAO Pu^{2, 3}, DING Chenhui⁴

(1.School of Digital Business, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Industry, Changzhou 213164, China; 2.School of Tourism and Health Care, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Industry, Changzhou 213164, China; 3.School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China; 4.Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Received:2024-05-23 Revised:2024-08-20 Online:2025-02-20 Published:2025-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于2008—2020年我国部分省市的面板数据，构建面板模型与中介效应模型检验机制，构造数字产业结构高级化指数、数字产业结构合理化指数、高质量人力资本指数，以及测量技术创新与制度创新的指标体系，分析高质量人力资本对数字产业结构优化的影响机制。研究发现：1）高质量人力资本能提高劳动生产率,改善物质要素使用效率,发挥要素报酬递增效应，使人力资本结构与数字产业用工结构相匹配，最终促进数字产业结构优化。2）技术创新与制度创新均能促进数字产业结构优化，针对产业结构高级化，制度创新的中介作用大约是技术创新中介作用的16倍，针对产业结构合理化，制度创新的中介作用大约是技术创新中介作用的10倍。3）人口流动性与高等教育水平的差异，可以解释我国不同区域间高质量人力资本对数字产业结构的异质性影响。高质量人力资本对数字产业结构高级化的估计系数均显著，但人口净流入地区大约是人口净流出地区的2倍，起步型地区大约是卓越型地区与中等型地区的2倍。高质量人力资本对数字产业结构合理化的正向影响仅在人口净流出地区显著。在各子样本的中介作用中，对数字产业结构高级化而言，制度创新的中介作用是技术创新的5~13倍，对数字产业结构合理化而言，制度创新的中介作用是技术创新的7~9倍。据此提出以下建议：提升数字产业从业人员的整体素质，充分发挥高质量人才对技术创新的促进作用，持续激发高质量人才参与制度创新的内驱力，有效协调技术创新与制度创新的内在关系，制定高质量人才发展的差异化政策。

关键词: 高质量人力资本, 数字产业结构, 技术创新, 制度创新

Abstract: This paper, based on the panel data of some provinces in China from 2008 to 2020, establishes a panel model and mediating effect model, and fabricates such indices as digital industrial structural advancement index, digital industrial structural rationalization index, high-quality human capital index, and technical & institutional innovation index to analyze the impacting mechanism of high-quality human capital on optimization of digital industrial structure. High-quality human capital can increase productivity, improve element use efficiency, fulfill remuneration incremental effect, match human capital structure with digital industrial employment structure, and finally promotes an optimization of digital industrial structure. Both technical innovation and institutional innovation can drive optimization of digital industrial structure. As for industrial structural advancement, the mediating effect of institutional innovation is 16 times that of technical innovation, and 10 times for industrial structural rationalization. Variance of population fluidity and high educational level can explain the heterogeneous impacts of human capital on digital industrial structure in different areas. The estimated coefficients for the impact of high-quality human capital on digital industrial structural advancement are significant，which in areas with a net population inflow are 2 times of areas with a net population outflow, and which in areas of starting type are 2 times of areas of outstanding type. Positive impact of high-quality human capital on digital industrial structural rationalization is outstanding only in areas with a net population outflow. Mediating effect of institutional innovation on digital industrial structural advancement is 5 to 13 times of technical innovation, 7 to 9 times on digital industrial structural rationalization. This paper puts forward suggestions on raising quality of digital industrial staff, fulfilling promotion of high-quality talents on technical innovation, stimulating inner driving forces of high-quality talents participating institutional innovation, coordinating the relation between technical innovation and institutional innovation, and making differentiated policies for high-quality talents.

Key words: high-quality human capital, digital industrial structure, technical innovation, institutional innovation

中图分类号:

张宁, 苗圃, 丁晨辉. 高质量人力资本对数字产业结构优化的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(1): 107-119.

ZHANG Ning, MIAO Pu, DING Chenhui. IMPACTS OF HIGH-QUALITY HUMAN CAPITAL ON OPTIMIZATION OF DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE[J]. Resources & Industries, 2025, 27(1): 107-119.

参考文献

蔡玉蓉, 汪慧玲, 2018. 创新投入对产业结构升级的影响机制研究: 基于分位数回归的分析[J]. 经济问题探索（1）: 138-146.

陈晋玲, 张靖, 2019. 教育层次结构与产业结构优化效应的统计测度[J]. 科学学研究, 37（11）: 1990-1998.〔CHEN J L, ZHANG J, 2019.The statistical measurement of education structure and industrial structure optimization effect[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 37(11): 1990-1998.〕

杜庆昊, 2021. 数字产业化和产业数字化的生成逻辑及主要路径[J]. 经济体制改革（5）: 85-91.〔DU Q H, 2021.Generation logic and main path of digital industrialization and industrial digitization[J]. Reform of Economic System(5): 85-91.〕

冯素玲, 许德慧, 2022. 数字产业化对产业结构升级的影响机制分析: 基于2010—2019年中国省际面板数据的实证分析[J].东岳论丛, 43（1）: 136-149.〔FENG S L, XU D H, 2022.Analysis of the influence mechanism of digital industrialization on industrial structure upgrading: empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data from 2010 to 2019[J]. Dongyue Tribune, 43（1）: 136-149.〕

干春晖, 郑若谷, 余典范, 2011.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究, 46（5）: 4-16, 31.〔GAN C H, ZHENG R G, YU D F, 2011.An empirical study on the effects of industrial structure on economic growth and fluctuations in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 46(5): 4-16, 31.〕

郭艳冰, 胡立君, 2022. 人工智能、人力资本对产业结构升级的影响研究: 来自中国30个省份的经验证据[J]. 软科学, 36（5）: 15-20.〔GUO Y B, HU L J, 2022.Study on the impact of AI and human capital on industrial structure upgrading: empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces[J]. Soft Science, 36(5): 15-20.〕

韩永辉, 黄亮雄, 王贤彬, 2017. 产业政策推动地方产业结构升级了吗?: 基于发展型地方政府的理论解释与实证检验[J]. 经济研究, 52（8）: 33-48.〔HAN Y H, HUANG L X, WANG X B, 2017.Do industrial policies promote industrial structure upgrading?: theory and evidence from China’s development-oriented local government[J]. Economic Research Journal, 52(8): 33-48.〕

黄榕, 丁晓昌, 2022. 中国高等教育高质量发展水平的测度研究[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 40（7）: 100-113.〔HUANG R, DING X C, 2022.Study on the measurement of higher education high-quality development level in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University(Educational Sciences), 40(7): 100-113.〕

何小钢, 罗奇, 陈锦玲, 2020. 高质量人力资本与中国城市产业结构升级: 来自“高校扩招”的证据[J]. 经济评论（4）: 3-19.〔HE X G, LUO Q, CHEN J L, 2020.High-quality human capital and upgrading of urban industrial structure in China: evidence from enrollment expansion[J]. Economic Review(4): 3-19.〕

靳卫东, 2010. 人力资本与产业结构转化的动态匹配效应: 就业、增长和收入分配问题的评述[J]. 经济评论（6）: 137-142.〔JIN W D, 2010.The effect of dynamic matching between human capital and industrial structure transformation[J]. Economic Review(6): 137-142.〕

李静, 楠玉, 2019. 人力资本错配下的决策: 优先创新驱动还是优先产业升级?[J]. 经济研究, 54（8）: 152-166.〔LI J, NAN Y, 2019.Decision-making under misallocation of human capital: giving priority to industrial restructuring or R&D?[J]. Economic Research Journal, 54(8): 152-166.〕

李敏, 孙佳佳, 张婷婷, 2020. 人力资本结构高级化对产业结构升级的影响研究: 基于中国省级面板数据[J].工业技术经济, 39（8）: 72-77.〔LI M, SUN J J, ZHANG T T, 2020.Research on the impact of human capital structure upgrading on industrial structure upgrading: based on provincial panel data[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 39(8): 72-77.〕

刘富华, 梁牧, 2021. 新型城镇化、人力资本与产业结构升级: 基于人口老龄化的调节效应[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 50（6）: 46-55.〔LIU F H, LIANG M, 2021.New urbanization, human capital and industrial structure upgrading: based on the moderating effect of population aging[J]. Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University, 50(6): 46-55.〕

刘伟, 张辉, 黄泽华, 2008.中国产业结构高度与工业化进程和地区差异的考察[J]. 经济学动态（11）: 4-8.

柳卸林, 2014. 技术创新经济学[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社.

毛丰付, 高雨晨, 周灿, 2022. 长江经济带数字产业空间格局演化及驱动因素[J].地理研究, 41（6）: 1593-1609.〔MAO F F, GAO Y C, ZHOU C, 2022.Evolution characteristics of spatial patterns of digital industry and its driving factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Geographical Research, 41(6): 1593-1609.〕

孙斌栋, 王颖, 2007. 制度变迁与区域经济增长: 中国实证分析[J]. 上海经济研究（12）: 3-11.

王芳琴, 2024. 人力资本、资源集聚与产业结构协调发展的实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 24（4）: 113-123.〔WANG F Q, 2024.Coordinated development empirical study on human capital, resources agglomeration and industrial structure[J]. Resources & Industries, 24(4): 113-123.〕

王俊豪, 周晟佳, 2021. 中国数字产业发展的现状、特征及其溢出效应[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 3: 103-119.〔WANG J H, ZHOU S J, 2021.The current situation, characteristics and spillover effect of the development of digital industry in China[J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 3: 103-119.〕

武鑫, 2011. 人力资本与制度供给[J]. 社会科学家（6）: 111-114.

吴翌琳, 黄实磊, 2022. 制度变迁、经济发展与宏观交易费用的动态演进: 新发展格局视角的实证与建议[J]. 宏观经济研究（4）: 5-22.〔WU Y L, HUANG S L, 2022.The dynamic evolution of institutional change, economic development and macro transaction costs: an empirical and suggestions from the perspective of new development patterns[J]. Macroeconomics（4）: 5-22.〕

温忠麟, 叶宝娟, 2014. 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J]. 心理科学进展, 22（5）: 731-745.〔WEN Z L, YE B J, 2014.Analyses of mediating effects: the development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5): 731-745.〕

尹庆民, 戴敏, 2024. 创新型人力资本对产业结构升级影响的实证研究: 基于技术进步的中介效应[J]. 资源与产业, 26（2）: 124-140.〔YIN Q M, DAI M, 2024.Empirical study on impacts of innovative human capital on industrial structural upgrading based on mediating effect of technological progress[J].Resources & Industries, 26(2): 124-140.〕

张凤林, 2011. 人力资本理论及其应用研究[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆.

张嫚, 2002. 论数字产业对传统反垄断理论与实践的启示[J]. 经济评论（4）: 103-106.

张旭路,金英君,王义源, 2020. 我国教育人力资本结构对产业结构优化升级的研究[J]. 科学决策（2）: 24-41.〔ZHANG X L, JIN Y J, WANG Y Y, 2020.Study on the effect of discrepancy of human capital on industrial structure optimization and upgrading[J]. Scientific Decision Making(2): 24-41.〕

中国信息通信研究院, 2020. 中国信通院发布《中国数字经济发展白皮书2020》[EB/OL\].[2021-05-14].http://www.coi.org.cn/article/y/gnxw/202105/20210503061197.shtml.

周海银, 2014. 人力资本与产业结构升级: 基于省际面板数据的检验[J]. 东岳论丛, 35（9）: 95-99.

周敏, 李磊, 朱新华, 2020. 新型城镇化对产业结构调整的影响及作用路径: 基于中介效应的实证分析[J]. 财贸研究（5）: 28-38.〔ZHOU M, LI L, ZHU X H, 2020.Impacts and function route of new-type urbanization on industrial restructuring in China: based on the mediating effect method[J]. Finance and Trade Research(5): 28-38.〕

周启良, 范红忠, 2021. 高等教育人力资本集聚对产业结构升级的非线性影响: 基于中国287个地级及以上城市面板数据的实证分析[J].重庆高教研究, 9（4）: 43-58.〔ZHOU Q L, FAN H Z, 2021.The nonlinear impacts of higher education human capital agglomeration on industrial structure upgrading: an empirical analysis based on the panel data of 287 cities at and above the prefecture level in China[J]. Chongqing Higher Education Research, 9(4): 43-58.〕

ATSU F, ADAMS S, 2023. Financial development and innovation: do institutions and human capital matter?[J]. Heliyon, 9(8).

CICCONE A, PAOAIOANNOU E, 2009. Human capital, the structure of production and growth[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,91(1):66-82.

DITTMAR J E, MEISENZAHL R R,2020. Public goods institutions, human capital, and growth: evidence from German history[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(2): 959-996.

GAO P, ZHANG K, ZHENG P, 2024. The impact of industrial digitization on the global value chains position: evidence from China's industry sectors[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82: 147-162.

GHOBAKHLOO M, 2020. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252: 119869.

HILPERT U, 2021. Regional selectivity of innovative progress: industry 4.0 and digitization ahead[J]. European Planning Studies, 29(9): 1589-1605.

KHAN Z, ALI S, DONG K, et al., 2021. How does fiscal decentralization affect CO₂ emissions?: the roles of institutions and human capital[J]. Energy Economics, 94: 105060.

MA H, SUN Y, YANG L, et al., 2023. Advanced human capital structure, industrial intelligence and service industry structure upgrade: experience from China's developments[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 59(5): 1372-1389.

NGUYEN B, CANH N P, THANH S D, 2021. Institutions, human capital and entrepreneurship density[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12: 1270-1293.

OESTERREICH T D, TEUTEBERG F,2016. Understanding the implications of digitization and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry[J]. Computers in Industry, 83: 121-139.

ROMER P, 1990. Endogenous technological change[J]. Journal of Political Economy(98): 71-102.

XIE X Y, WANG J, 2023. Study on the impact of industrial digitization on carbon emissions: evidence from China's logistics industry[J]. Environmental Research Communications, 5(10): 105008.

ZHAO K, WU Y, KUANG Z, 2023. Dynamic evolution and impact mechanism of human capital mismatch in strategic emerging industries: evidence from the Yangtze River Delta region of China[J]. Heliyon, 9(11).

[1]	郭梦冉, 周茜, 邓凯. 数字经济背景下数字政府对工业企业技术创新的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2025, 27(1): 132-145.
[2]	郭远维, 支援. 企业异质性对低碳技术合作稳定性的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(5): 145-153.
[3]	张兵, 余一辰, 邹晨. 水生态文明城市建设试点影响工业水资源绿色效率吗？[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(4): 62-74.
[4]	孙全胜. 中国绿色经济发展机制问题和创新路径[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(4): 91-103.
[5]	荣屹, 胡海生. 技术创新条件下资源税对劳动力就业的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(3): 160-170.
[6]	袁汝华, 王雅平, 贾葵源. 基于CiteSpace的国内外企业绿色技术创新研究可视分析 [J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(2): 151-163.
[7]	杨恺钧, 曹安琪, 方慈慧. 新能源汽车产业集聚对区域绿色经济效率的影响——基于长江经济带的实证研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2024, 26(1): 35-49.
[8]	苗圃, 张宁, 田泽, 丁晨辉. 破解大气污染协同治理难题的产业协同路径研究——以长江三角洲地区为例[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 67-77.
[9]	周申蓓, 杨喆, 张桂清. 营商环境对我国中小企业技术创新的影响——基于资源基础观的视角[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 93-104.
[10]	许纪校, 陆倩倩. 沉淀性冗余资源对我国制造业企业技术创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(4): 116-126.
[11]	仇蕾, 马蓓文, 周钦, 程常高. 环境规制对重污染企业投资偏好的影响——基于我国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 92-106.
[12]	张倩, 梅亚丽, 王奎. 环境保护税、技术创新与制造业企业绩效——有调节的中介效应[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(3): 107-120.
[13]	黄子琦, 刘清泉. 长江经济带产业协同集聚对绿色技术创新的影响机制——基于税收竞争的中介效应 [J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 23-36.
[14]	高枝欣, 许纪校. 重污染企业社会责任、高管激励与绿色技术创新[J]. 资源与产业, 2023, 25(2): 88-100.
[15]	万欣, 苏鹏程, 毛鹏. 异质性治理主体视角下环境规制的治污路径——基于中介效应的空间差异分析[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(5): 108-116.

高质量人力资本对数字产业结构优化的影响研究

IMPACTS OF HIGH-QUALITY HUMAN CAPITAL ON OPTIMIZATION OF DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL STRUCTURE

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics