Resources & Industries ›› 2022, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 64-75.DOI: 10.13776/j.cnki.resourcesindustries.20210903.002
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Jie 1, 2, SUN Jie 1, ZHU Mingming 1
Received:
2021-03-28
Revised:
2021-08-12
Online:
2022-04-20
Published:
2022-04-23
Contact:
ZHANG Yansong
About author:
E-mail:zhangjie_jie@126.com
张 婕 1,2,孙 洁 1,朱明明 1
通讯作者:
张艳松,博士生,主要从事资源产业经济研究。yansong7769@163.com
作者简介:
张婕,博士、副教授,主要从事环境会计与政府会计研究。E-mail:zhangjie_jie@126.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Jie, SUN Jie, ZHU Mingming. POLICY EFFECTS EVALUATION OF ECOLOGICAL COMPENSATION OF WEI RIVER STREAM[J]. Resources & Industries, 2022, 24(2): 64-75.
张婕, 孙洁, 朱明明. 渭河流域生态补偿政策效果评估研究[J]. 资源与产业, 2022, 24(2): 64-75.
蔡昉,都阳,2000. 中国地区经济增长的趋同与差异: 对西部开发战略的启示[J]. 经济研究(10): 30-37,80. 〔CAI F, DU Y, 2000 Convergence and divergence of regional economic growth in China[J]. Economic Research Journal(10): 30-37, 80.〕 陈伟,余兴厚,熊兴,2018政府主导型流域生态补偿效率测度研究: 以长江经济带主要沿岸城市为例[J]. 江淮论坛(3): 43-50. 〔CHEN W, YU X H, XIONG X, 2018. Research on measurement of ecological compensation efficiency of government-dominated watersheds: taking the major coastal cities of Yangtze River Economic Belt for example[J]. Jianghuai Tribune(3): 43-50. 〕 陈祥有,2014. 我国生态补偿资金的财政绩效评估[J]. 中南财经政法大学学报(3): 66-71. 陈艳萍,程亚雄,2018. 黄河流域上游企业参与生态补偿行为研究: 以甘肃段为例[J]. 软科学,32(5): 45-48〔CHEN Y P, CHENG Y X, 2018. Enterprises' ecological compensation behavior of the Yellow River Basin upstream: a case of Gansu section[J]. Soft Science, 32(5): 45-48. 〕 党维勤,牛志鹏,马增胜,2011. 黄河流域的水土保持生态补偿及发展建议[J]. 中国水土保持(7): 41-44. 付意成, 张剑, 张春玲,2017. 流域生态补偿“三性”衡量理论研究[J]. 水电能源科学,35(11): 107-111〔FU Y C, ZHANG J, ZHANG C L, 2017. Conceptual approach for measuring effectiveness, efficiency and equity of eco-compensation related to watershed[J]. Water Resources and Power, 35(11): 107-111. 〕 耿言虎,2018. 跨社区生态补偿机制的实践困境与构建策略[J]. 河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版),20(3): 57-63,92〔GENG Y H, 2018. Practical predicament and construction strategy of cross community ecological compensation mechanism[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 20(3): 57-63, 92. 〕 郭显光,1998. 改进的熵值法及其在经济效益评价中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践(12): 98-102〔GUO X G, 1998. Application of improved entropy method in evaluation of economic result[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice(12): 98-102. 〕 韩美,王一,崔锦龙,等,2012. 基于价值损失的黄河三角洲湿地生态补偿标准研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境,22(6): 140-146. 〔HAN M, WANG Y, CUI J L, et al., 2012. Study on wetland ecological compensation standard based on the value loss in the Yellow River Delta[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 22(6): 140-146. 〕 韩艳利,娄广艳,葛雷,等,2016. 黄河流域与水有关生态补偿框架的探讨[J]. 水资源保护,32(6): 142-150. 〔HAN Y L, LOU G Y, GE L, et al., 2016. Discussion of water-related ecological compensation framework for Yellow River Basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 32(6): 142-150.〕 何理,冯立阳,赵文仪,等,2019. 关于我国流域横向生态补偿机制的回顾与探索[J]. 环境保护,47(18): 32-38. 〔HE L, FENG L Y, ZHAO W Y, et al., 2019. Review and exploration on river basin horizontal eco-compensation mechanism in China[J]. Environmental Protection, 47(18): 32-38. 〕 景守武,张捷,2018. 新安江流域横向生态补偿降低水污染强度了吗?[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 28(10): 152-159.〔JING S W, ZHANG J, 2018. Can Xin'anjiang river basin horizontal ecological compensation reduce the intensity of water pollution? [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(10): 152-159. 〕 李芬,张林波,陈利军,2014. 三江源区生态移民生计转型与路径探索: 以黄南藏族自治州泽库县为例[J]. 农村经济(11): 53-57. 李洁,宋晓谕,吴娜,等,2018. 渭河流域甘肃段生态补偿成本测度与分区[J]. 经济地理,38(1): 180-186. 〔LI J, SONG X Y, WU N, et al., 2018. Payments for ecosystem services based on invest model and cost-benefit analysis: a case of Weihe River Basin in Gansu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 38(1): 180-186. 〕 李秋萍,李长健,2015. 流域水资源生态补偿效率测度研究: 以中部地区城市宜昌市为例[J]. 求索(10): 34-38. 刘红,2013. 三江源生态移民补偿机制与政策研究[J]. 中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),33(6): 101-105. 刘瑞明,赵仁杰,2015. 西部大开发: 增长驱动还是政策陷阱: 基于PSM-DID方法的研究[J]. 中国工业经济(6): 32-43〔LIU R M, ZHAO R J, 2015 Western development: growth drive or policy trap: an analysis based on PSM-DID method[J]. China Industrial Economics(6): 32-43. 〕 吕志祥,孟天琦,2014. 渭河源头区生态补偿机制缺失及重构新论[J]. 中国水土保持(1): 19-23. 曲超,刘艳红,董战峰,2019. 基于DID模型的流域横向生态补偿政策的污染: 贵州省赤水河流域实证研究[J]. 生态经济,35(9): 194-198. 〔QU C, LIU Y H, DONG Z F, 2019. Performance evaluation of pollution reduction based on DID model for watershed ecological compensation policy: an empirical study of Chishui River Basin in Guizhou Province[J]. Ecological Economy, 35(9): 194-198. 〕 苏杨,苏燕,慕博,2017. 黄河流域生态补偿标准研究: 以宁夏隆德县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,38(8): 39-42,72. 〔SU Y, SU Y, MU B, 2017. The Yellow River Basin ecological compensation standard: taking Ningxia Longde as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 38(8): 39-42, 72.〕 孙付华,张晓杰,高鑫,等,2021. 基于声誉效应的跨流域生态补偿演化合作机制分析[J]. 资源与产业,23(1): 87-96.〔SUN F H, ZHANG X J, GAO X, et al., 2021Cooperative mechanism of transstream ecological compensation evolution based on reputation effect[J]. Resources & Industries, 23(1): 87-96. 〕 王奕淇,李国平,2016. 基于能值拓展的流域生态外溢价值补偿研究: 以渭河流域上游为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 26(11): 69-75. 〔WANG Y Q, LI G P, 2016. Study of watershed spillover ecological value compensation based on expansion emergy: a case of Weihe watershed upstream[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(11): 69-75. 〕 吴娜,宋晓谕,康文慧,等,2018. 不同视角下基于InVEST模型的流域生态补偿标准核算: 以渭河甘肃段为例[J]. 生态学报,38(7): 2512-2522. 〔WU N, SONG X Y, KANG W H, et al., 2018. Standard of payment for ecosystem services in a watershed based on InVEST model under different standpoints: a case study of the Weihe River in Gansu Province[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 38(7): 2512-2522. 〕 徐瑞璠,刘文新,倪琪,等,2021. 风险感知、政府信任与城镇居民生态补偿支付水平: 基于渭河流域572户的微观实证[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,35(4): 10-16. 〔XU R P, LIU W X, NI Q, et al., 2021. Risk perception, government trust and urban residents' ecological compensation payment level in Weihe river basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 35(4): 10-16. 〕 徐勇,王传胜,2020. 黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展: 框架、路径与对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊,35(7): 875-883.〔XU Y, WANG C S, 2020. Ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin: framework, path, and countermeasure[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 35(7): 875-883. 〕 薛继亮,2014. 生态脆弱地区高耗水产业和水权分配协同体系建设研究: 以黄河上中游流域为例[J]. 资源与产业,16(4): 52-56. 〔XUE J L, 2014. Water-intensive industry and water right allocation collaboration system construction in ecologically vulnerable areas: a case study on the middle and upper reaches of Yellow River[J]. Resources & Industries, 16(4): 52-56. 〕 叶芳,王燕,2013. 双重差分模型介绍及其应用[J]. 中国卫生统计,30(1): 131-134. 张婕,倪存昊,朱明明,2020. 新安江流域生态补偿财政支出效率研究[J]. 中国环境管理,12(4): 112-119. 〔ZHANG J, NI C H, ZHU M M, 2020. Study on the financial expenditure efficiency of ecological compensation in Xin'an River Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Management, 12(4): 112-119. 〕 张明波,田义文,2013. 渭河全流域生态补偿机制研究[J]. 广东农业科学,40(3): 163-166. 〔ZHANG M B, TIAN Y W, 2013. Study on ecological compensation mechanism in Wei river basin[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 40(3): 163-166. 〕 CLOT S, ANDRIAMAHEFAZAFY F, GROLLEAU G, et al., 2015. Compensation and Rewards for Environmental Services (CRES) and efficient design of contracts in developing countries: behavioral insights from a natural field experiment[J]. Ecological Economics, 113: 85-96. HECKMAN J J, ICHIMURA H, TODD P, 1998. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(2): 261-294. JOHST K, DRECHSLER M, WÄTZOLD F, 2002. An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures[J]. Ecological Economics, 41(1): 37--49. ROSENBAUM P R, RUBIND B, 1985 Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity[J]. The American Statistician, 39(1): 33-38. ROSENBAUM P R, RUBIN D B, 1983 The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects[J]. Biometrika, 70(1): 41-55. SIERRA R, RUSSMAN E, 2006 On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica[J]. Ecological Economics, 59(1): 131-141. THADEN J V, MANSON R H, CONGALTON R G, et al., 2021 Evaluating the environmental effectiveness of payments for hydrological services in Veracruz, México: a landscape approach[J]. Land Use Policy, 100: 105055. ZHANG C, LI J, ZHOU Z X, et al., 2021. Application of ecosystem service flows model in water security assessment: a case study in Weihe River Basin, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 120: 106974. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||